OSMTH and the Grand Priory of England is a chivalric non-denominational Christian organisation whose objects are the Christian values of Faith, Hope, and Charity.We are not a political organisation, are not associated with any political organisation and have no political aims or ambitions.We emphatically denounce all those who seek to besmirch the honourable reputation of the Knights Templar for any political, subversive or unlawful activity.
The“LarmeniusCharter”(or“CartaTransmissionis”)isamanuscriptallegedlywrittenbyJohannesMarcusLarmeniusinFebruary1324.WritteninLatin,itlists22successiveGrandMastersoftheKnightsTemplarafter JacquesdeMolay,concludingwithBernard-RaymondFabré-Palaprat,whorevealedtheCharterin1804.StyledasanancientTemplarCodexandhousedatMarkMasons’HallinLondon,itsauthenticityisdisputed based on code analysis and discovery circumstances but never definitively disproven. According to the Charter, Larmenius—then in his seventies—rstates that the Grand Mastership of the Knights Templar Order was verbally transmitted to him ten years earlier (March, 1314) by the imprisoned Jacques de Molay, the last Grand Master of the Knights Templar. Larmenius was a Palestinian-born Christian who joined during the Order’s final Crusader years and later served as Seneschal after relocating to Cyprus post-1295. Due to age, Larmenius transferred leadership to Franciscus Theobaldus, Prior of Alexandria. TheCharteraimedtoensureanunbrokenlineofGrandMastersandinitiatedtheOrder’s“SecondPhase”duringits“DarkPeriod,”leadingtopartial revival at the 1705 Convent General in Versailles where Philippe, Duke of Orléans became Grand Master. TheOrderdissolvedduringtheFrenchRevolution whenGrandMasterDuke TimoléondeCosséBrissac waskilled;hisfurniture wasboughtbyBrother Ledru(thephysician’sson),whofoundtheCharterhiddeninsideandgaveittoFabré-Palapratin1804.Oraltransmissionofleadershipwaslikely necessary due to persecution; such oral successions were probably later documented for accuracy. Thedocument'scredibilityhingeslessonagethanonwhetherthissuccessionmethodexistedunderJacquesdeMolay.Giventheirintelligence networks and preparedness for hostility, such contingency plans are plausible—particularly considering Father Larmenius’s role at that time. Manyrecordsweredestroyedbychurchauthorities;thosepreservedentailedsignificantrisk.Inthiscontext,oraltransmissionafter1314waslikelythe safest approach.CriticsarguethatpartsofthecharterusemodernisedLatinformsunusualforitsclaimedorigin,butthisofferslittleevidenceagainstitsauthenticity. Languageevolves,andeachtranscriptionmayreflectcontemporaryusage.Thecodelikelyaimedtohidemeaningfromoutsiders,notserveasan official record. ThesepointsdonotunderminethetheoryoforaltransmissionorthelegitimacyofwhatisnowcalledtheLarmeniusCharter;rather,theysuggestit couldbealatercopydocumentingactualleadershipsuccessionafter1314.Fabré-Palaprat,linkedwiththemodernOrderoftheTempleduringthe Enlightenmentandinfluencedbyitsideals,viewed“Templar”and“Templarity”asembodyingassistance,protection,decency,dedicationand chivalry—the founding principles of his new Order. Inthe19thcenturyRomanticera,these valuesattractedprominentsupporters. Templarlegends—losttreasures, ArkoftheCovenant,HolyShroud,Holy GrailandRosslynChapel—becamewovenintomysticalnarratives.InNapoleonicFrance—whenNapoleonreplacedmonarchywithhisown order—recognising Fabré-Palaprat’s revived Order further established royal authority; Napoleon’s official recognition in 1804 added credibility. TheOrderresurgedwhenNapoleon’sinnercirclerevitalisedit;NapoleonIIIlaterraiseditsprofilefurther.Afterhisdeathitlostitsmainpatron; subsequent wars fragmented unity within the International Order of the Temple. Today many groups worldwide use variations of the Templar name. ThedirectsuccessorstoFabré-Palaprat’sTemplarsarethoseusingOrdoSupremusMilitarisTempliHierosolymitani(OSMTH),headquarteredinParis. ThisgroupremainedloyaltoFernandodeSousaFontesasGrandMasterdespitehisappointmentbyhisfatherwithoutelection.TheOrder’smotto comes from Psalm 115:1: “Non nobis Domine non nobis sed Nomini Tuo da gloriam”—“Not for us Lord not for us but to Thy name give glory.”Today,theOrderisasecular-militaryorderofchivalryopentoaccomplishedChristianmenand women—KnightsandDames—whoupholdhighethicalstandardsand wishtocontinue Templartraditions. Themissionof the modern Order is to prove that spiritual idealism remains relevant today, blending tradition with patriotism and civic duty. Modern Templarsuse wordsinsteadofswords,focusingonpeace,humanitarianaid,mutualsupport,education,andupholdingChristianethical values. Actionmustaccompanytheseideals;eachKnightshouldbegin fostering chivalry within their family before extending it to wider society.